Compare

Head-to-head benchmarks of our miner against the public alpha-miner and pearl-miner on the same hardware, plus pool fees and expected daily earnings. We publish the data and the methodology so anyone can reproduce it.

Pools

 Oyster Poolpearlhash.xyzalphapool.techmineprl.com
Fee3.0 %3.0 %5.0 % + 1 % dev4.4 %
PayoutPPLNSPPLNSPPLNSPPLNS
Min payout1 PRL1 PRL1 PRL0.1 PRL
Stratum endpointsstratum.oysterpool.com:4444single6 regions1
Public APIREST + WS
Per-GPU telemetry
PPLNS verify endpoint
Mobile dashboard

Miner benchmarks

GPUoysterpoolalpha-minerpearl-miner+% vs alpha+% vs pearl
H100 SXM
H200 SXM
B200
RTX 5090
RTX 4090
L4
A100 80GB
MI300X

Expected daily earnings · RTX 5090 sample

$/kWh = 0.10 · network = . Daily emission is approximate; revenue scales linearly with your share of network hashrate. Power cost uses your local $/kWh.

PoolHashrateFeeGross PRL/dNet PRL/dPower $/d

Methodology

  • Same physical GPU, same wallclock window, same Pearl testnet target.
  • Hashrate reported is the median over 30 minutes after a 10 minute warm-up.
  • Three miners run sequentially with cool-down to normalize thermals.
  • Raw logs and harness source are in benchmarks/runner/ in the GitHub repo.